Conditions this year were even better than the levels seen in 2024. All throughout the day, 10, 15 and 20 meters were hopping. There was a hours-long DX run on 10 meters Sunday morning which was absolutely amazing. Scores from even the smallest Vermont stations were up. There was even an increase in received logs from DX stations.
There were 33 Vermont stations submitting logs, up from 29 from last year. Another 29 Vermont stations were on the air, but did not submit logs, for a total of 62 Vermont stations active at one time or another. We had 3 very active rovers who put 13 of Vermont's 14 counties on the air.
The great conditions bumped up
the phone QSO’s by 38% up to 10677 QSO's.
CW QSO's were up by a whopping 62% to 3704 QSO's. The new scoring of 3 points per CW QSO certainly had a lot to do with this.
At the same time, digital QSO's were down by 33% to 4830 QSO's. More people going to the higher scoring QSO's on CW had an effect
but another factor was that some big digital operators from last year were only on part time this year.
Vermont stations logged a total of 19211 QSO's, setting a new record. Who said that Vermont is hard to work?
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top VT Stations
|
Ron KK1L (Chittenden/FN34) once again took the top spot with 922K in a one-day operation. He used all three modes equally to run up a good point total and impressive multiplier total. Kevin KE1VT (Addison/FN34) was very close behind the top spot, with 883K for 2nd place. He had the most QSO's and multipliers on phone and CW, but the difference was decided on digital. Cathy NQ1B (Washington/FN34) returned to the Vermont QSO Party after a several year layoff. She had good numbers across all three modes, good for 256k. Joe K1VMT (Lamoille/FN34) decided to work only CW this year and put up a very impressive 253k for 4th place. He was the QSO and multiplier leader on CW. Randy N1SP (Bennington/FN32) ran up 232k on all three modes for 5th place, running up an impressive total on CW. He just edged out Matthius AC1RI (Orleans/FN34), who operated digital only and was the highest digital entry. The top 6 spots were claimed by stations in 6 different counties! W1XIV (Chittenden/FN34) (formerly W1JXN) was a multiop with operators Zach K1ZK, Tom N1GZZ and Rod N1SZO. They ran up a score of 800k which also included QSO's on RTTY. Chris KI1P (Rover) visited 13 of 14 counties in his ham van and used high power and a high antenna to log 2393 QSOs on phone. Darryl K1TTW (Rover/FN33) put 3 rare northeastern Vermont counties on the air for a score of 73k. WA1J (Rover) was a CW-only, multiop rover with operators Maz K1NZ and Mike N1TA. They activated 8 counties in Eastern Vermont for a score of 44k At host station W1NVT (Chittenden/FN34), Paul AA1SU and I tallied a ridiculous 4040 QSOs, 272 multipliers for a score of 1.36M across 10 bands and 3 modes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Some changes were made to the submission process where the robot did more checking to make sure logs were in the proper format. Specifically, contacts made outside the contest period (February 1-2 UTC) are tossed out. Contacts are then checked for proper formatting. A contact indicating "DG" for digital needs to show grid squares, while contacts with SSB, PH, or CW, need to show states or DX. This may have cause some grief during the log submission process, but it made our job in the log checking department much less hectic. We still have a rather weird way of uploading digital and non-digital logs separately and we hope that in the future, software writers will fully embrace digital format QSO's into their logs.
The logs are automatically uploaded to a server where we can download them for log checking. This is why it is important to not try to directly e-mail the logs to the contest sponsor as it bypasses the process.
While there were less problems with logs, logging inaccuracies are still seen. For each QSO where we receive both logs, a comparison
is made. If the incorrect callsign is logged, that is a busted QSO. If the incorrect state is logged, that is miscopied information.
The operator making the mistake loses the contact. But there are more complicated situations where there is a mismatch with the logged
bands or modes or times. The software will tag this as "Not In Log" (NIL) and will remove the QSO from both stations.
Where possible, a human (me) will review the mismatch and judge who made the error and adjust the QSOs accordingly.
I understand that most operators have their logging software control their radio and this type of mismatch should be a rare. Nonetheless,
we see a lot of mismatches, resulting in lost QSO's and sometimes, lost multipliers. In the Vermont QSO Party, we only remove the
QSO judged to be incorrect. In other contests, an additional penalty of one extra QSO is lost. Accuracy counts!
Thanks to Bruce WA7BNM who maintains the log upload robot and Ken K1EA who maintains the Log Checking software for all of their work
in keeping our logs accurate!
|
|
Top Outside of VT Stations
|
Carl NX3A from Virginia repeats as our outside Vermont champion for the FOURTH time with an impressive 9405 points from 109 QSO's using low power. He had big QSO totals on all three modes for a nice finish including an amazing 32 Vermont QSO's on digital. We don't know his operating secrets, but I can tell you that whenever we switched to a new band or mode at W1NVT, he was right there working us within minutes! Dave WN4AFP from South Carolina, a frequent top ten finisher, made it into the top 3 this year with a very impressive score of 7007. Mark K1RO from New Hampshire, a frequent competitor in the VtQP, takes 3th place with 5940 points. This is even more impressive considering how difficult it is to work Vermont from New Hampshire over a 150 mile hop on 10, 15 and 20 meters. Jeff N8II from West Virginia, a frequent top 10 finisher, takes 4th place with 3450 points. Ken KD2KW from Texas is new to the top 10 and ends up as our number 5 finisher this year with 3278 points. Mike NE8P from Florida is also new to the top 10 and moved in on number 6 with 3260 points. Andrew K9CW from IL takes 7th place with 2835 points with a big total on CW. Ed NN2D from New Jersey takes 8th place with 2772 points with an impressive 25 Vermont QSO's on digital Al K2AL also from New Jersey, takes 9th place with 2610 points Mark WB9HFK from Illinois, a frequent top ten finisher grabs the 10th spot with 2511 points. Anthony K8ZT had the highest QRP score of 2318 points from 32 QSOs more than doubling his score from last year. Amazing what you can do with 10 watts and expert ability. The top 25 outside Vermont scores were all pretty close and it was a competitive finish! |
|
|
|
|
In the Vermont competition, certificates will go out to the top 5 single op finishers, top multi op finisher and top rover finisher. In addition, all Vermont stations making over 100 QSO’s will also get a certificate. In the Outside Vermont competition, the “grand prize” for the 2025 Vermont QSO Party is a souvenir 3.4 oz jug of genuine Vermont Maple Syrup which goes to the top 3 Outside Vermont finishers who are within the U.S. You guys worked hard for those contacts and we recognize you with a product which is uniquely Vermont. If you’ve never had Maple Syrup before, it is very sweet and very concentrated, so a little goes a long way! Here in Vermont it is the breakfast topping of choice on pancakes, waffles or whatever. Certificates will also go out to the top 10 stations outside Vermont and stations outside Vermont working 20 or more QSO’s. |
|
We are very happy with the resurgence of CW this year. We take pride in the Vermont QSO Party that we encourage stations
to get on the air with a variety of bands, modes and power levels, all in the name of having fun!
If you have any ideas on how to improve the event, please let us know!
Video on my Ham Van roving expedition during the Vermont QSO Party can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOevKvoPN9A (KI1P/R)
A good portion of the weekend was dedicated to cleaning up snow and some family duties, but was still able to operate about 18 hours. The bands were kind into Europe and out west to TX, AR, MT but I only worked the west coast 5 times. 100 watts to a 135' doublet antenna and 35 watts digital. Great fun as always! (N1SP)
Operated from Manatee Springs State Park in SC. (K4FT)
Busy PVRC weekend, but made a few QSOs. (K8LF)
At 02/01/25 2240z, W1NVT sent "5NN CHI"! At02/01/25 2200z (Sunrise here), I heard K2LE on 40m CW via Long path. Vermont is a long way away! (JN4MMO)
Interesting submittal process with CW/SSB uploaded seprate from FT8/FT4, so hoping it is all good. In any case I needed VT for CW WAS which I should be able to put to rest after this weekend. Stay warm. (NN2D)
Used two indoor fan dipoles and 90 watts. (K2MN)
IC-7300 @ 60W into a PAR EndFedz EF-20 EFHW. (VA2NW)
All contacts made with an Elecraft KH1 and 34 foot EFHW ant. (VE3JO)
Rig was FTdx101 and Butternut vertical. Most qso's were made while hunting in the upper bands. Thanks for being there. (W1END)
Great fun. I missed one contact and possible multiplier because I did not understand the station that gave me two counties was sitting on the county line. I will know better next time. (W7XB)
Made more contacts this year! (WA2CNV)
It was a bit challenging finding VT signals within the huge contesting crowd. I was happy to contact W1NVT on both 20M and also cw on 80M, and then contacting K1VMT also on 80M. I had fun here on my first VTQP participation this year, and I intend to participate here (VTQP) again next year. (WB8WUZ)
This QSO Party was a big disappointment. While the contest runs 48 hours, what good is it, when there are no VT stations to be found. I worked the same handful of stations on both modes. What good is a QSO party if y'all don't play in your own event. (WQ6X)
VTQP Manager replies: It just wouldn't feel right without the annual comments from WQ6X about lack of Vermont stations! Congrats on being the high score from CA despite poor condx from the West Coast. By the numbers: 33 Vermont stations made 19211 contacts and we worked 275 CA stations from W1NVT, not counting digital. Vermont was IN THE HOUSE! Suggestions for improvement: watch the cluster late morning and early afternoon on 10-20M, run higher power (QRP is tough over a 2500 mile path), use FT8 and FT4 - a lot of stations are on digital now, and as a frequent remote op at other stations, choose a location in the Eastern part of the country and you will hear a lot more Vermont stations!
100 watts to wire antennas. Enjoyed the Party, thanks for the fun! (KE0TT)
Fun contest. Very noisy. Thanks to those who made it a successful event. (N0CK)
Thanks for the contacts. Thank you for sponsoring the contest. (W1QK)
Thank you for the 2025 Vermont QSO Party. (KF3G)
Thanks everyone for another fun event. While the weather is nice, plan for next year. Get out there and put up some bigger antennas!
We look forward to upcoming years of great participation.